PEO-LLAMANZARES VS. COMELEC AND ELAMPARO
POE-LLAMANZARES VS. COMELEC AND ELAMPARO
G.R.NO. 221697. MARCH
2016
FACTS:
Grace Poe was found in a church in Iloilo sometime in 1968.
The children of the who found her reported the incident before the Local Civil
Registrar. It was named as Mary Grace Militar. She was subsequently adopted by
Fernando Peo Jr. and Susan Roces sometime in 1974. In year 2006, a Certificate
of Live Birth in the name of Mary Grace Poe was issued by the Civil Registrar
of Iloilo.
At the age oof 18 Poe was registered as a voter of San Juan.
She married to Teodoro Llamanzares and flew to U.S.A after the wedding. In
2001, Poe became naturalized American Citizen.
In 2004, Peo come back to the Philippines to support her
father’s candidacy. She then returned to U.S. After learning of her father’s
deteriorating condition, Poe returned within the same year. Because she wanted to
be with her grieving mother, she and her husband decided to move and reside
permanently in the Philippine in year 2005. In 2006, Poe took her oath of
allegiance to the Republic of the Philippines. She also filed a sworn petition
to reacquire Philippine citizenship. The Bureau of Immigration acted in favor
of the Petition and she and her children were then considered dual citizens.
In 2011, Poe executed an oath of renunciation of Nationality
of U.S and she issued a certificate of loss of Nationality of U.S effective
October 2010.
Poe in year 2013 won and proclaimed a senator of the
Philippines. In October 2015 she filed her certificate of candidacy for
Presidency where she declared herself as natural born Filipino citizen. Several
petitions were filed against Poe’s citizenship.
ISSUE:
Whether the principle of Jus Sanguinis applied to
foundlings, hence whether Pore is a natural born Filipino citizen.
HELD:
As a matter of law, foundlings are a class, natural born
citizens. While the 1935 Constitution’s enumeration is silent as to foundlings,
there is no restrictive language which would definitely exclude foundling
either. Because of the silence and ambiguity in the enumeration as to
foundlings, there is no need to examine the intent of the framers. The intent
of the framers and the people adopting it should be given effect.
Domestic laws on adaptation also support the principle that
foundlings are Filipinos. These laws do not provide that adoption confers
citizenship upon adoptee. Rather, the adoptee must be a Filipino in the first
place to be adopted.