RE:APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR VS. VICENTE D. CHING, APPLICANT BAR MATTER NO. 914, OCTOBER 1, 1999


FACTS:

Vicente Ching, a legitimate son of the spouses Tat Ching, a Chinese citizen, and Priscila Dulay, a Filipina, was born in La Union on April 11, 1964. CHing after graduated Bachelor of Laws in the City of Baguio, filed an application to take the 1998 bar exam, The Supreme Court allowed him to take the Bar examinations provided that he can produce proof of his Philippine Citizenship. Ching Complied.

In 1999, Ching was one of the successful bar examinees, however, he was not allowed to take his oath due to his questionable citizenship. OSG filed his comment that CHing, being the legitimate child of a Chinese father and a Filipino mother born under the 1935 Constitution was indeed a Chinese citizen and continued to be so, unless upon reaching the age of majority he elected Philippine citizenship.

ISSUE: Whether Ching is a Filipino citizen. Whether his election to Philippine citizenship within the reasonable time.

 
HELD:


No. Since the applicant was born on 1964, the governing charter with regards to citizenship issue is the 1935 constitution. Therefor, as said by this Constitution, the citizenship of legitimate child followed the citizenship of the father unless upon reaching the age of majority which is 21, he elected Philippine citizenship.
In the case at bar, Ching did not elect his citizenship when he reached 21 years of age but instead in 1999 which is 14 years after reaching the age of majority, and which the court considered as not within the reasonable period of time. Court also said that Philippine citizenship can never be treated like commodity that can be claimed when needed and suppressed when convenient. The court denies Ching’s application for admission to the Philippine bar.

Popular posts from this blog

GOCHAN vs. YOUNG

ARNOLD HALL vs. PICCIO

PEO-LLAMANZARES VS. COMELEC AND ELAMPARO