RE:APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR VS. VICENTE D. CHING, APPLICANT BAR MATTER NO. 914, OCTOBER 1, 1999
FACTS:
Vicente Ching, a legitimate son of the spouses Tat Ching, a Chinese
citizen, and Priscila Dulay, a Filipina, was born in La Union on April 11,
1964. CHing after graduated Bachelor of Laws in the City of Baguio, filed an
application to take the 1998 bar exam, The Supreme Court allowed him to take
the Bar examinations provided that he can produce proof of his Philippine
Citizenship. Ching Complied.
In 1999, Ching was one of the successful bar examinees,
however, he was not allowed to take his oath due to his questionable
citizenship. OSG filed his comment that CHing, being the legitimate child of a
Chinese father and a Filipino mother born under the 1935 Constitution was
indeed a Chinese citizen and continued to be so, unless upon reaching the age
of majority he elected Philippine citizenship.
ISSUE: Whether Ching is a Filipino citizen. Whether his election
to Philippine citizenship within the reasonable time.
HELD:
No. Since the applicant was born on 1964, the governing
charter with regards to citizenship issue is the 1935 constitution. Therefor,
as said by this Constitution, the citizenship of legitimate child followed the
citizenship of the father unless upon reaching the age of majority which is 21,
he elected Philippine citizenship.
In the case at bar, Ching did not elect his citizenship when
he reached 21 years of age but instead in 1999 which is 14 years after reaching
the age of majority, and which the court considered as not within the
reasonable period of time. Court also said that Philippine citizenship can never
be treated like commodity that can be claimed when needed and suppressed when
convenient. The court denies Ching’s application for admission to the
Philippine bar.